• Menu
  • Product
  • Email
  • PDF
  • Order now
  • When to Use High-Speed Comparators or ADCs for Distance Measurements in Optical Time-of-Flight Systems

    • SNOAA63 October   2020 TLV3604 , TLV3605

       

  • CONTENTS
  • SEARCH
  • When to Use High-Speed Comparators or ADCs for Distance Measurements in Optical Time-of-Flight Systems
  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1Introduction
  3. 2How ToF Measurements are Calculated
  4. 3Importance of Comparator's Minimum Pulse Width Detection Capability
    1. 3.1 Importance of Comparator's Input Overdrive Dispersion
  5. 4Conclusion
  6. IMPORTANT NOTICE
search No matches found.
  • Full reading width
    • Full reading width
    • Comfortable reading width
    • Expanded reading width
  • Card for each section
  • Card with all content

 

APPLICATION NOTE

When to Use High-Speed Comparators or ADCs for Distance Measurements in Optical Time-of-Flight Systems

Trademarks

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

1 Introduction

Time-of-Flight is regarded as a very accurate distance mapping technology that has been used for over a century. ToF systems can be found in a wide variety of products, from proximity sensors, drone vision, machine vision, to automotive ADAS LiDAR systems. As seen with this system variety, ToF technology can calculate distances from just a few millimeters to several meters, have different field of views, power requirements, solution sizes, and different resolutions depending on the components used within the system. While there are different mediums to calculate distance in a ToF system such as ultrasonic or radar, this tech note will focus primarily on optical ToF systems.

2 How ToF Measurements are Calculated

Optical ToF systems consist of a light transmitter and receiver. The emitter is typically an LED or a laser diode that sends short analog light pulses which reflect off a target. When this pulse is sent, this is typically denoted as the “Start Event”. The reflected light from the target is returned to the receiver, generally a photodiode combined with a TIA to convert the photonic energy into electrical current. Since the speed at which light travels through a given medium is constant, the distance to the target can be calculated by measuring the time delay between when the initial light pulse is sent, to when it is reflected and received back.

Using light waves allows for reliable detection of fast-moving objects, and performs well in ambient light conditions. Likewise, measurements can be calibrated for temperature, humidity, and air pressure. Once the reflected light has returned back to the receiver, this is denoted as the “Stop Event”. The time difference between the start and stop event is used to determine the distance to the object; the propagation delays of all devices within the system are then de-skewed out of this time difference. What is left is the time it took for the light pulse to have a full round trip cycle from when the initial pulse is sent and received back. Dividing this value by two gives the time it takes for the light to reach just the target object. The equation for distance can then be defined as:

Equation 1. d=(c*t)/2,

where

d is distance,

c is the speed of light (3x10^8),

t is the time difference between the start and stop event.

GUID-20201022-CA0I-ZWNL-CDPQ-PTQPPPKFPQFH-low.svgFigure 2-1 Time-of-Flight Concept

An example of a ToF system is shown in Figure 2-2 . The system uses a laser diode as the stimulus to the target object. Once the laser driver reaches the target and gets reflected back, transimpedance amplifiers are then used to convert the photodiode current into a voltage. From here, either a high-speed comparator or an ADC is used to capture data and send downstream to another device such as an FPGA or a high end DSP for computation of the ToF measurement.

GUID-20201022-CA0I-DZCH-5DNJ-VMX4MPSGBG0V-low.svg Figure 2-2 Time-of-Flight Concept Diagram

Although many of the components upstream from a comparator or ADC in the receiver path of the ToF system are the same, the way in which it measures distance can be quite different. With a comparator, one of the inputs is tied to a reference voltage. The light pulse expected in the reflection from the target object is then measured and compared to this reference voltage. If the reflected light pulse crosses the reference threshold, the distance to that object can be measured. The comparator will output high denoting the “Stop Event”, and downstream devices can compute the distance to the target from this trigger.

An ADC meanwhile, samples the analog signal at a high frequency and digitizes the signal to bits. These bits contain amplitude and timing information to send downstream to a processing device where not only distance can be calculated, but other useful measurements such as color or material type can be determined as well, based off the reflectivity or amplitude of the reflected pulse.

There are several benefits of choosing either a comparator or an ADC to capture ToF data, but choosing the correct device comes from the system needs and exactly what data needs to be captured. If more than just distance is required to be calculated, than an ADC in the receiver path would be an appropriate choice. However, if just a distance measurement to the target object is needed, than a comparator would be a more practical and cost effective solution.

Although using a comparator in the receiver path limits the system to only measuring the distance to an object, using a comparator greatly simplifies the signal chain, as there is no need for a high end signal processing device in the backend. This greatly improves the robustness of the system as it is typically much easier to integrate a comparator into the receiver path, rather than an ADC which requires more complex devices to be tested and integrated into the system. A Simple TDC or an FPGA and MCU combination is all that is needed downstream to calculate the ToF distance measurement. As mentioned previously, distance can simply be calculated with the equation

Equation 2. d = (c*t)/2

This results in cost savings in multiple ways: a smaller solution size, a lower cost receiver chip, and lower cost in external components and downstream processing devices.

3 Importance of Comparator's Minimum Pulse Width Detection Capability

Generally, the laser driver in a ToF system is required to operate under a specific wattage so that if any human comes between the transmitter and target option, the laser will not damage their retina or skin. Below are two images depicting the wave in the transmitter side.

GUID-20201022-CA0I-LJP8-SS3R-DZ2MKHN5CWVZ-low.svgFigure 3-1 Examples of ToF Transmitted Pulses

Although the pulse widths of the two images are different, the area under the curve of both images is the same – depicting that they have the same wattage use. The image on the left with the narrower pulse width is used to detect a target object several meters further than the image on the right. The image with the wider pulse would be used to detect an object at a shorter distance. To detect objects further away from the ToF System while operating under the same power requirements, the receiver needs to have the capability to detect narrower pulse widths.

For ADC’s, this translates to the amount of samples per second the ADC can measure. If the ADC does not have a high enough sampling rate and the reflected pulse is too narrow, the ADC will not be able to accurately digitize the data to bits to calculate the distance to the target object. The same will happen if using a comparator that cannot detect the reflected pulse width. In fact, the comparator may not respond to the signal at all and a distance measurement might not be calculated.

ADC’s with a sample rate equivalent to a comparator’s minimum pulse width detection capabilities will be much more expensive to both purchase and incorporate into a ToF system. However the decision to use one over the other should still mostly depend on if more than just distance is needed to be calculated in a ToF system. If a decision has been made to use a comparator as a receiver in the ToF system, than selecting a comparator with better minimum pulse width capabilities will result in being able to measure a target object at a further distance.

 

Texas Instruments

© Copyright 1995-2025 Texas Instruments Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Submit documentation feedback | IMPORTANT NOTICE | Trademarks | Privacy policy | Cookie policy | Terms of use | Terms of sale