• Menu
  • Product
  • Email
  • PDF
  • Order now
  • LDC Target Design

    • SNOA957B September   2016  – June 2021 LDC0851 , LDC1001 , LDC1001-Q1 , LDC1041 , LDC1051 , LDC1101 , LDC1312 , LDC1312-Q1 , LDC1314 , LDC1314-Q1 , LDC1612 , LDC1612-Q1 , LDC1614 , LDC1614-Q1 , LDC2112 , LDC2114 , LDC3114 , LDC3114-Q1

       

  • CONTENTS
  • SEARCH
  • LDC Target Design
  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1The Sensor
  3. 2Eddy Currents
    1. 2.1 Image Currents and Target Size
    2. 2.2 Skin Depth
    3. 2.3 Sensors Have Two Sides
    4. 2.4 LDC Interaction Through Conductor
  4. 3Target Shape
  5. 4Target Composition
    1. 4.1 Perfect Target Material Characteristics
    2. 4.2 Aluminum Targets
    3. 4.3 Copper Targets
    4. 4.4 Steel and Magnetic Material Targets
    5. 4.5 Conductive Ink
    6. 4.6 Ineffective Target Materials
  6. 5Summary
  7. 6References
  8. 7Revision History
  9. IMPORTANT NOTICE
search No matches found.
  • Full reading width
    • Full reading width
    • Comfortable reading width
    • Expanded reading width
  • Card for each section
  • Card with all content

 

APPLICATION NOTE

LDC Target Design

Trademarks

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

1 The Sensor

An inductive-to-digital converter (LDC) senses the change in inductance caused by the movement of a conductive target through the senor’s AC magnetic field. The target movement with respect to the sensor may be either axial or lateral with respect to the plane of the sensor. The characteristics of the sensor, as discussed in the TI application note LDC Sensor Design, determine the characteristics of the sensor’s magnetic field and the overall system measurement resolution and accuracy.

2 Eddy Currents

Whenever a conductor interacts with an AC magnetic field, eddy currents are induced on the conductor’s surface. Lenz’s Law states that induced currents will flow in a manner to oppose the magnetic field, which weakens the original magnetic field in a measurable way. LDC devices use an inductor in a resonant circuit to generate an AC magnetic field, as shown in Figure 2-1. Any generated eddy currents will weaken the inductor’s magnetic field, which effectively reduces the inductance of the resonant circuit, which is typically detectable by the LDC. Depending on the device, an LDC measures either the shift in resonance and/or the energy losses in the resonant circuit and in the target (due to the eddy currents).

GUID-9B8121FB-0473-4A26-909D-9B27AF9C3A69-low.pngFigure 2-1 AC Magnetic Field Interaction With Conductor

2.1 Image Currents and Target Size

For many LDC applications, a flat spiral inductor printed on a PCB is an effective sensor design. An example is shown in Figure 2-2. Some of the primary considerations for the sensor include the total inductance, the resonant frequency, and the physical size of the inductor.

GUID-835E65AC-D09D-4D26-9014-78618F482F2B-low.pngFigure 2-2 Spiral PCB Inductor

When a conductive target is brought into the magnetic field of the inductor coil, the eddy currents on the surface of the conductor will flow in the lowest possible impedance path. This path take is composed of concentric loops which match the shape of the sensor.

GUID-E4B6C9FB-FC9F-4560-96EA-35AB6E9E56DA-low.gifFigure 2-3 Image Current Flow on Target

Any differences in the image current path compared to the sensor current path will result in a weaker change in the sensor’s magnetic field. For this reason, the strongest target response occurs when the target size larger than the sensor size, as the image current path can better mirror the flow of current in the sensor. If the target size is smaller than the sensor, the change in sensor frequency will be reduced, as shown in Figure 2-4.

GUID-1CA57D38-FAAC-4953-B857-138DC9D89E16-low.gifFigure 2-4 Sensor Inductance Shift vs Target Radius With Target 1 mm From Sensor

In Figure 2-4, the sensor is a spiral of 10 mm diameter, 25 turns per layer, with 4 layers having an inductance of 36 μH. The targets are stainless steel 304 disks, and held coaxially at a 1 mm distance from the sensor. As always, a larger change in the sensor inductance is desirable, since a larger change allows the target position to be measured with higher resolution. When the target radius is less than 0.1 cm, the sensor measurement changes by less than 1% of its nominal value. Position measurement of such a small target will have lower effective resolution due to the smaller inductance change. When the target size is increased to match the size of the sensor, the sensor measurement changes by >21%. This larger shift can be measured with much greater resolution.

 

Texas Instruments

© Copyright 1995-2025 Texas Instruments Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Submit documentation feedback | IMPORTANT NOTICE | Trademarks | Privacy policy | Cookie policy | Terms of use | Terms of sale